{"id":5213,"date":"2014-05-09T06:00:29","date_gmt":"2014-05-09T06:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cvm.org.uk\/blog\/?p=5213"},"modified":"2017-02-28T13:21:42","modified_gmt":"2017-02-28T13:21:42","slug":"9-signs-that-you-might-be-an-intellectually-dishonest-atheist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cvm.org.uk\/blog\/demolition-squad\/9-signs-that-you-might-be-an-intellectually-dishonest-atheist\/","title":{"rendered":"9 Signs That You Might Be An Intellectually Dishonest Atheist"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cReality is a cocktail of fantasy\u201d Micah Purnell.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

We lie to ourselves all the time. I lie to myself about how good-looking I am. I like to imagine that \u2018I\u2019ve still got it\u2019. And then I walk past a reflection of myself that I wasn\u2019t expecting to see, and before my brain has chance to readjust to my idealised view, I catch a glimpse of what I actually look like \u2013 how other people see me. And it hurts; so I blot it out as quickly as possible.<\/p>\n

We all construct our own truth. It\u2019s our way of getting through life. And when a lie gets told and retold, eventually the real truth gets suppressed and our constructed truth becomes our reality.<\/p>\n

A great example of this is the film Shutter Island (Spoilers ahead). In this film, Leonardo di Caprio is a man driven insane by the death of his children and murdering of his own wife. Unable to cope with the truth, he constructs his own reality where he is a renowned detective. The doctors at the mental asylum where he is housed decide to use this constructed reality in their favour, and set up a false trail of clues for \u201cDet. Teddy Daniels\u201d to follow \u2013 which ultimately lead to the uncomfortable truth that he is not in fact a detective, but is the asylum\u2019s most dangerous patient. At the climax of the film, he rejects the real story in favour of his created universe \u2013 and is lobotomised!<\/p>\n

So what about you? What if the worldview you\u2019ve constructed is false? And what if you\u2019re missing a greater truth \u2013 and, unlike in Shutter Island, a better truth? Here are some signs that you might be intellectually dishonest when it comes to the question of God.<\/p>\n

1. You only read\/watch what you already agree with<\/b>. \u00a0The books\/blogs you read \u2013 or videos you watch – fit in with your existing worldview and serve simply to confirm your own prejudices. You deliberately stay away from anything that might challenge you. You start to unfollow people who post things on Twitter and Facebook that you disagree with. This is telling. When we truly feel comfortable with what we believe, we can happily imbibe contrasting or conflicting views. If you\u2019re so sure you\u2019re right, then why do you shy away? There\u2019s a chance that you\u2019re strengthening the foundations of a belief that you\u2019ve built upon the sand.<\/p>\n

2. \u201cPeople who disagree with me are stupid<\/b>!\u201d That\u2019s why you don\u2019t read or watch anything Christian \u2013 they\u2019re so obviously deluded. But it\u2019s not that, is it? Psychologically, when we don\u2019t want to be challenged by something, we need to convince ourselves that it is ridiculous. We need to alienate it and dispose of it. So we start using extreme words like stupid or irrational, which help us distance ourselves from the challenge. This is where terms like Magic Sky Clown<\/a> and Jewish Zombie<\/a> come from. By reducing Christianity \u2018ad absurdum\u2019, we don\u2019t need to worry about its potential truth. We wrap ourselves in protective labels.<\/p>\n

3. You get angry with those who disagree. <\/b>You swear at or shout down people in conversation, or walk away from a discussion. You convince yourself that your anger is righteous at how immoral their viewpoint is, but is that really true? Anger is what happens when we don\u2019t feel in control and try to re-exert our own power in a situation. Think of any scenario where you\u2019ve lost your temper and you\u2019ll see it follows that process. It\u2019s an emotional response, not an intellectual one. It\u2019s a sign that you\u2019re out of your depth, that you don\u2019t know everything. People sure of what they believe and confident of its truthfulness tend to remain calm in conversation. \u201cI get angry \u2018cos they\u2019re stupid!\u201d you might say. See bullet point 2.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re getting angry when talking to Christians, maybe you\u2019re not quite as clued up as you thought you were. That\u2019s OK \u2013 just follow the path where it leads.<\/p>\n

4. You use words like \u2018rational\u2019 and \u2018logical\u2019 and \u2018free-thinking\u2019 to describe yourself.<\/b> These words are like verbal placebos. They create a pleasant feeling of security in us without actually proving us to be any of those things. However, calling yourself logical and rational doesn\u2019t somehow magically transform all your ideas into logical, rational ideas.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

5. You deliver statements as though they are questions<\/b>. But you\u2019re not really looking for the answers. A question like \u2018How could God allow so much suffering<\/a>?\u2019 is a good question, but it doesn\u2019t automatically follow that he wouldn\u2019t. The answers to these questions are hard, of course, but they\u2019re out there, if only you\u2019re prepared to look.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Have you considered that maybe you\u2019re using the <\/span>question<\/i> to shield yourself from the <\/span>answer<\/i>?
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

6. You use ad-hominem attacks<\/b>. When you fear that someone \u2018on the opposing side\u2019 is more knowledgeable in their viewpoint, or you run out of your own arguments, you try to undermine them by criticising their moral character or appearance. Looking to devalue what someone has said because of something you don\u2019t like about them is a common trick, but totally dishonest. It also commits the genetic fallacy, but I\u2019m probably an idiot for saying that.<\/p>\n

7. You quote famous atheists, without being able to back up their arguments<\/b>. Dawkins, Hitchens, Bertrand Russell. In place of delivering your own ideas and thoughts, you simply quote something that one of your heroes has said. The problem is that you find it much more difficult to build on those sound bites when pushed. An example of this would be \u2018You\u2019re an atheist when it comes to Zeus. Atheists just go one God further\u2019. How would you respond when informed that this is a joke, not an argument? What\u2019s your follow-up argument?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

See what I mean? A quote from an atheist is not in itself an argument for atheism. We all need to be careful that emotive, persuasive language doesn\u2019t replace actual argumentation.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

8. You use generic catch-all phrases which show your poor hand. <\/b>\u2018<\/span>Everybody knows Jesus never existed<\/a>\u2019, or \u2018<\/span>It\u2019s a scientific fact that science has disproven God<\/a>\u2019 work here. Statements like this are usually a dead giveaway that you haven\u2019t really looked into what you\u2019re talking about. Usually, whatever it is that \u2018everybody knows\u2019, everybody doesn\u2019t know it \u2013 you wouldn\u2019t have to say that if it were the case. And usually, \u2018everybody knows\u2019 really means \u2018I don\u2019t know\u2019. Top academic debaters don\u2019t go around saying \u2018everybody knows\u2019, in the same way that serious scientists don\u2019t talk about science disproving God. For people who do know what they\u2019re talking about, this sort of conversational device just calls your own bluff.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

9. You never really critique your own beliefs<\/b>. Attacking, ignoring or sneering at other viewpoints is often a way of deflecting attention away from yourself. Sadly, despite what we\u2019d like to believe about ourselves, most people in our society aren\u2019t won over by reasoned, rational arguments, but by advertising. Are your reasons for believing what you believe genuinely rational and considered, or are they simply a verbal manifestation of how you feel? And are your reasons for rejecting other worldviews equally rational, or does the idea of a God who has more power than you simply create a negative emotional reaction, which you then reject? Does it cut up your desire for autonomy, or conflict with your trust that you are in control?<\/span><\/p>\n

My belief is that, if you do any of these 9 things, you may be confusing your intellect with your emotions. Crucially, the reasons most people give for rejecting Jesus are almost never as rational and well-thought-out as they think, but instead a sort of advertising slogan for their desires.<\/p>\n

How we feel is not always a good gauge of truth. The truth doesn\u2019t always underwrite our feelings, but often wounds them.<\/p>\n

How will you deal with that? What do you want? Your truth? Or The Truth<\/i>?<\/p>\n

Because The Truth<\/i> might be better than you think.<\/p>\n

<\/div>