Jesus Christ is arguably the most influential man in the whole of human history. So, outside of the Bible \u2013 which incidentally is an incredibly reliable document \u2013 what kind of evidence is there that Jesus ever existed? Is dear old Mr. Russell right? Is there any extra-biblical evidence for Jesus?<\/p>\n
Jesus was born in Bethlehem and grew up in Nazareth under the watch of the Roman Empire, which covered much of Europe, Northern Africa, and parts of the Middle East. So what did the Romans, the rulers of the day, have to say? Here\u2019s Tacitus, probably the best Roman Historian in the world:<\/p>\n
\u201cChristus \u2026 suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This small excerpt is part of a longer piece on how the Romans treated the early Christian church. Tactitus, writing in the second half of the 1st<\/sup> Century, corroborates Biblical facts about Jesus and the birth of the early church.<\/p>\nA popular objection to the Biblical record may be, \u201cThe early Christians made up the stories about Jesus because they needed to spread their false message.\u201d Well, Tacitus and the Romans didn\u2019t need to spread the message. Quite the opposite; they wished the Christians didn\u2019t exist! This is simply an honest historical account of the facts.<\/p>\n
Another group of people not exactly tickled by the arrival of Jesus were the Jews. So let\u2019s see what the Jewish historical record says.<\/p>\n
Here we have Josephus. Writing in the early 90s (first Century) this Jewish Historian says:<\/p>\n
\u201cNow there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was the Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct to this day.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Hmm. Jesus, Pilate \u2026 the extra-biblical record does seem to be emerging clearly.<\/p>\n
Christian History<\/h2>\n
We also have records from Christians. We have the Bishop of Rome, Clement, here writing to the church in Corinth:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Apostles received the Gospel for us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ was sent forth from God. So then Christ is from God, and the Apostles are from Christ.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Or how about Ignatius? Just one of the many Christians murdered in Rome. He wrote of the crucifixion, as did Justin Martyr. In fact, both of these men quote facts, places, and names \u2013 all things easily checked by their readers.\u00a0 Additionally, both of these men were martyred for their faith in Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n
It was the 16th<\/sup> Century French mathematician, Blaise Pascal, who said, \u201cI believe those witnesses who get their throats cut.\u201d<\/p>\nThat\u2019s the thing. These historical records were composed by people who didn\u2019t have much to gain but plenty to lose. Reputation, peace, or even their lives were at stake.<\/p>\n
So, back to Mr Russell. You may not want Jesus to have existed for any number of reasons but the plain facts of the matter are that the historical record has overwhelming evidence for the remarkable life of Jesus Christ. As one New Testament scholar has put it, \u201cThe theory of Jesus\u2019 non-existence is now effectively dead as a scholarly question.\u201d<\/p>\n
If Jesus didn\u2019t exist then we don\u2019t need to deal with him seriously. But he did exist and his life challenges us today. Will we ignore him, or will we brave further investigation of the man who has changed human history more than anyone else in all time?<\/p>\n
<\/div>